Cognitive and behavioral approaches have been used throughout the history of man. As natural components of life, they have occurred naturally for good or evil and have been extensively honed by spiritual leaders from the oldest known records of the Vedic teaching to Buddha and Jesus. Recent works by Bandura, Seligman, Ellis, Beck, Arnold Goldstein and many others have not only documented the effects of such interventions, but have keenly focused on shaping positive effects which result in enabling persons to improve their ability to develop mutually satisfying and gratifying relationships.
It is almost universally recognized that how a person thinks about themselves, others and future events determines their selection of functional behaviors. Additionally, the behavior selection can be dramatically reduced if requisite social skills are not available. It is only now becoming clear as to how these two factors interrelate in a cycle of action/reinforcement that leads either to socialization or distortion and deficit. A distorted picture of the world makes one less likely to choose appropriate behaviors, even if s/he has the skills; and if a lack [deficit] of skill results in inappropriate behavior, it is likely to result feedback that impacts one’s picture of the world.
Finally, the status of ritual becomes apparent as the process of telling oneself [self verbalization] and others positive things [e.g., belief in God, belief in one’s self as a good person] help to create a serenity, which is reciprocated by social reinforcement. It is, perhaps, a process of “survival of the fittest” that our gods have gradually evolved from many to one; and from fear provoking to loving. The serenity that occurs from a belief in a loving god is apparent and the term “enlightenment” evokes the cognitive qualities that bring it about.
Moreover, since these cognitive activities are a normal part of everyday functioning in process, if not in content, they are non-intrusive interventions. No one can make you think anything; that is an internal decision. For most of us that decision is unconscious and based on a history of experiences and interpretations of which we are not aware. Cognitive Behavior Management provides ways to help people make informed decisions in regard to self, others and future prospects and provides the skills for doing that. The person, however, decides what is best for him or her. One may choose to be a criminal regardless of the problems in living that such a choice creates. The fact that most people, given the option won’t make such a choice is a positive statement about human beings.
There are three practical protocols in Cognitive Behavior Management: 1) Cognitive Rehabilitation, which includes restructuring and cognitive error correction, 2) Cognitive Skills Development, and development of a 3) Cognitive Culture. Into these three, all the techniques and procedures fit.
These two circumstances are always interactive. Additionally, both paradigms assume that natural social learning through personal experience has resulted in behavior patterns that are ineffective in developing mutually satisfying and gratifying relationships, which is the arch requirement of a quality life. The outcome is problems in living that the person usually would like to resolve. Thus the motivation for involvement is enhanced. The techniques of modeling, behavior rehearsal, feedback and reinforcement are essentially the techniques of both paradigms as they mimic natural social learning constructs. The child learns first what parents and significant adults model and reinforce and then learn what peers model and reinforce.
The development of a COGNITIVE CULTURE is a process of “restructuring” the culture with ‘seeded’ content [e.g., prosocial words, icons, etc.] and teaching rituals [e.g., modeling, behavior rehearsal, feedback, and reinforcement] in order to shape the nature of the thoughts and behaviors in prosocial ways. This cultural approach is usually used preventatively, but is worth consideration in all environments.
DISCUSSION:
The determination of the context of these interventions varies widely depending on whether one is serving children or adults and by the descriptors of the problems in living. Offenders and psychotics have the same essential needs for the interventions.
You may want to check the following articles and/or links for contextual shaping:
Mental Health
Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy of Schizophrenia
http://www.tandfdc.com/PSYPRESS/BKFILES/CBTSCHIZ.HTM
http://www.guilford.com/paci/kingdon.htm
Corrections
Justice Services Resources – Correction Management